Heiniman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Heiniman v. State

120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 739

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 27, 1912

DocketNo. A-1269.

StatusPublished

This text of 120 P. 1126 (Heiniman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heiniman v. State, 120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 739 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at 'the January, 1911, term of the county court of Comanehe county, on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and on the 17th day of March, thereafter, was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of ninety days. No errors appearing from the record sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted at 'the January, 1911, term of the county court of Comanehe county, on a charge of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor, and on the 17th day of March, thereafter, was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred fifty dollars and be confined in the county jail for a period of ninety days. No errors appearing from the record sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heiniman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.