Heiniman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Heiniman v. State

1912 OK CR 104, 120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 737, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 27, 1912·No. No. A-1267.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Camanche county on the 1st day of March, 1911, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and thereafter on the 17th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred seventy-five dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No errors appearing front the record sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Camanche county on the 1st day of March, 1911, on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and thereafter on the 17th day of said month was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred seventy-five dollars and be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of thirty days. No errors appearing front the record sufficient to justify a reversal of this cause, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Heiniman v. State, 1912 OK CR 104, 120 P. 1126, 6 Okla. Crim. 737, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 326 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 104 (Heiniman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.