Heinig v. Smellow

50 A.2d 875, 139 N.J. Eq. 308, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 455
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 17, 1947·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Woodruff, and reported at 138 N. J. Eq. 119.

*309 For affirmance — The Chibe-Justice, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Raeeerty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heinig v. Smellow, 50 A.2d 875, 139 N.J. Eq. 308, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 455 (N.J. 1947).

50 A.2d 875 (Heinig v. Smellow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vitra Seal Co. v. Jaycox
62 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1948)