Heinecke v. Rawlings
11 F. Cas. 1037, 4 D.C. 699, 4 Cranch 699
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 15, 1836
StatusPublished
This text of 11 F. Cas. 1037 (Heinecke v. Rawlings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heinecke v. Rawlings, 11 F. Cas. 1037, 4 D.C. 699, 4 Cranch 699 (circtddc 1836).
Opinion
{nem. con.) was of opinion, that the objection to the validity of the indenture, because the age was not inserted therein, cannot be made by a stranger. As to him, the indenture is, under the 7th section of the statute, valid until set aside by the Court under the provisions of the same statute.
Verdict for the plaintiff, $ 16.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 1037, 4 D.C. 699, 4 Cranch 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinecke-v-rawlings-circtddc-1836.