Heine v. Weller
This text of 82 Misc. 402 (Heine v. Weller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order granting defendant’s motion to vacate an order obtained upon the application of plaintiffs to examine the defendant before trial. The learned court below granted the motion and vacated the order for defendant’s examination because of the denial of the defendant in his answer, and in the affidavit submitted upon the motion of all of the material allegations of the complaint. The fact that a defendant denies the allegations of the complaint does not of itself deprive the plaintiff of a right to examine him before trial, or furnish any legal ground for vacating an order for his examination. Istok v. Senderling, 118 App. Div. 162; Straus v. Peck, 126 N. Y. Supp. 628.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate order for defendant’s examination denied, with ten dollars costs.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 Misc. 402, 143 N.Y.S. 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heine-v-weller-nyappterm-1913.