Heine v. Gouger

149 A. 353, 8 N.J. Misc. 199, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 270
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 10, 1930
StatusPublished

This text of 149 A. 353 (Heine v. Gouger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heine v. Gouger, 149 A. 353, 8 N.J. Misc. 199, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 270 (N.J. 1930).

Opinion

Pee Cttbiam.

This suit was brought in the Camden City District Court to recover a book account amounting to $244.80. The case was tried by the court without a jury resulting in a judgment for the defendant. There is nothing in the paper book sent up with the appeal, presenting a question of law, upon [200]*200which the judgment of the District Court can properly be reviewed by -the Supreme Court. No specification of errors has been filed. Pratt v. Union National Bank, 81 N. J. L. 588. The judgment of the Camden City District Court is therefore affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A. 353, 8 N.J. Misc. 199, 1930 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heine-v-gouger-nj-1930.