Heine v. Acme Theatre Co.
139 A. 222, 104 N.J.L. 171, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 308
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affii'mance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisoh, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heine v. Acme Theatre Co., 139 A. 222, 104 N.J.L. 171, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 308 (N.J. 1927).
139 A. 222 (Heine v. Acme Theatre Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.