Heinberg Bros. v. Thompson
This text of 46 Fla. 242 (Heinberg Bros. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the courj upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thruston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325, and authorities cited therein; Johnson, Daniels & Co. v. Polk County, 24 Fla. 28, 3 South. Rep. 414.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Fla. 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinberg-bros-v-thompson-fla-1903.