Heinberg Bros. v. Thompson

46 Fla. 242
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the courj upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thruston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325, and authorities cited therein; Johnson, Daniels & Co. v. Polk County, 24 Fla. 28, 3 South. Rep. 414.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heinberg Bros. v. Thompson, 46 Fla. 242 (Fla. 1903).

46 Fla. 242 (Heinberg Bros. v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morrison v. McCaskill
46 Fla. 233 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)