Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Heimowitz v. Segal

Heimowitz v. Segal

54 A.D.2d 637, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14136
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 14, 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 637 (Heimowitz v. Segal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heimowitz v. Segal, 54 A.D.2d 637, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Order entered May 3, 1976 in the Supreme Court, New York County, unanimously affirmed, with $60 costs and disbursements to respondent for the reasons stated by Mr. Justice Greenfield at Special Term but, in the exercise of discretion, without prejudice to an application at Special Term for leave to replead as to any cause sounding in defamation and intentional infliction of [638]*638mental harm. (See Cushman & Wakefield v David, Inc., 25 AD2d 133.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Birns, Silverman and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. v. John David, Inc.
25 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A.D.2d 637, 387 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heimowitz-v-segal-nyappdiv-1976.