Heimlich Bros. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1068, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3395
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 17, 1969
DocketNo. P69/48; protest 67/45335 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1068 (Heimlich Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heimlich Bros. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1068, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3395 (cusc 1969).

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Singer sewing-machines which are manufactures of the United States, exported without drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value [1069]*1069or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. (Bertrand Freres, Inc., et. al v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bertrand Freres, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 155 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Cust. Ct. 1068, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heimlich-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1969.