Heimlich Bros. v. United States
This text of 62 Cust. Ct. 1068 (Heimlich Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Singer sewing-machines which are manufactures of the United States, exported without drawback, and returned without having been advanced in value [1069]*1069or improved in condition by any process of manufacture or other means and that the applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. (Bertrand Freres, Inc., et. al v. United States (47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Cust. Ct. 1068, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heimlich-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1969.