Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville

256 A.D. 993, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 13, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 993 (Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville, 256 A.D. 993, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

These are two actions for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs seek to have declared as invalid a zoning ordinance in so far as it pertains to their conducting an undertaking establishment in the village of Bronxville, and to prevent the municipal authorities from enforcing the ordinance as against them. In each action judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —• Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ. [168 Mise. 783.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robin v. Village of Hempstead
66 Misc. 2d 482 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Jones v. Chapel Hill, Inc.
273 A.D. 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 993, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heimerle-v-village-of-bronxville-nyappdiv-1939.