Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville
256 A.D. 993, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1939·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
These are two actions for a declaratory judgment. Plaintiffs seek to have declared as invalid a zoning ordinance in so far as it pertains to their conducting an undertaking establishment in the village of Bronxville, and to prevent the municipal authorities from enforcing the ordinance as against them. In each action judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —• Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ. [168 Mise. 783.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville, 256 A.D. 993, 11 N.Y.S.2d 367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
256 A.D. 993 (Heimerle v. Village of Bronxville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robin v. Village of Hempstead
66 Misc. 2d 482 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
Jones v. Chapel Hill, Inc.
273 A.D. 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)