Heimerdinger v. Schnitzler
136 Misc. 814, 242 N.Y.S. 622, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1334
This text of 136 Misc. 814 (Heimerdinger v. Schnitzler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Heimerdinger v. Schnitzler, 136 Misc. 814, 242 N.Y.S. 622, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinions
The meaning of the phrase “ seller’s 60 days ” was established without contradiction. The holding to the contrary was, therefore, without any evidence to support it.
Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for, with interest and costs.
Bijur and Peters, JJ., concur; Callahan, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 Misc. 814, 242 N.Y.S. 622, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heimerdinger-v-schnitzler-nyappterm-1930.