Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Heim v. State

Heim v. State

801 So. 2d 235, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17271, 2001 WL 1555880
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 7, 2001
DocketNo. 2D01-3554
StatusPublished

This text of 801 So. 2d 235 (Heim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heim v. State, 801 So. 2d 235, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17271, 2001 WL 1555880 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

SALCINES, Judge.

Michael S. Heim appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice to Heim’s right to file a properly sworn rule 3.850 motion alleging that the time he spent at a drug treatment center was the functional equivalent of jail. See Tennell v. State, 787 So.2d 65 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Columbro v. State, 777 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

FULMER, A.C.J., and COVINGTON, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbro v. State
777 So. 2d 1208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Tennell v. State
787 So. 2d 65 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
801 So. 2d 235, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17271, 2001 WL 1555880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heim-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.