Heim v. Bush

Eighth Circuit

Heim v. Bush

22 F. App'x 690

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 10, 2001·No. Nos. 01-2972, 01-3341·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur Heim challenges the district court’s¹ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 orders sanctioning him for filing harassing and frivolous litigation. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that, for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders, the district court did not abuse its discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm the result reached by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all pending motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Arthur Heim challenges the district court’s¹ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 orders sanctioning him for filing harassing and frivolous litigation. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that, for the reasons stated in the district court’s orders, the district court did not abuse its discretion.

Accordingly, we affirm the result reached by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny all pending motions.

Heim v. Bush, 22 F. App'x 690 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

22 F. App'x 690 (Heim v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related