Heily v. Woodcrest Properties

Fourth Circuit

Heily v. Woodcrest Properties

437 F. App'x 239

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 5, 2011·No. No. 11-1062·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel E. Heily, Warren Heily, and C.M. Welch appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Heily v. Woodcrest Properties, No. 5:10-cv-00094-gec (W.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2010). We deny Appellants’ motions to strike Appellees’ brief and to recuse their attorney. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Daniel E. Heily, Warren Heily, and C.M. Welch appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Heily v. Woodcrest Properties, No. 5:10-cv-00094-gec (W.D.Va. Dec. 16, 2010). We deny Appellants’ motions to strike Appellees’ brief and to recuse their attorney. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Heily v. Woodcrest Properties, 437 F. App'x 239 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

437 F. App'x 239 (Heily v. Woodcrest Properties) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.