Heils v. Cincinnati Traction Co.

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 122, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 384, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 222
Hamilton Circuit Court·Decided November 25, 1911·Published

Opinion

SMITH, P. J.

We think the demurrer of the Cincinnati Traction Company filed to the petition of plaintiff in error was properly sustained by the trial court.

While perhaps under the allegations of the petition the acts of negligence complained of against the traction company and the city of Cincinnati are such as constitute concurrent and related torts, yet the same are not joint, being independent in character, and therefore the defendants are not in law joint tort feasors. Morris v. Woodburn, 57 Ohio St. 330 [48 N. E. Rep. 1097]; Mineral City v. Gilbow, 81 Ohio St. 263 [90 N. E. Rep. 800; 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 627].

The action of the court upon the demurrer is correct and the judgment is affirmed.

Swing and Jones, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heils v. Cincinnati Traction Co., 23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 122, 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 384, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 222 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1911).

23 Ohio C.C. Dec. 122 (Heils v. Cincinnati Traction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.