Heilperin v. Levy

116 N.Y.S. 676
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ERLANGER, J.

Particulars of the defense of payment cannot be ordered. Barone v. O’Leary, 44 App. Div. 418, 60 N. Y. Supp. 1131. As to the other matters, the allegations are merely in effect denials of plaintiff’s allegations of ownership of the bond and mortgage referred to in the complaint. Particulars will not be ordered when the answer is merely a refutation of plaintiff’s assertions, nor will a party be required to disclose his evidence. Smith v. Anderson, 126 App. Div. 24, 110 N. Y. Supp. 191. In a proper case, a copy of an instrument will be ordered to be given; but this is not such a case.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heilperin v. Levy, 116 N.Y.S. 676 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1909).

116 N.Y.S. 676 (Heilperin v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jacob Bros. v. Kunitzer
116 N.Y.S. 677 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)