Heilman v. Progressive Insurance

749 N.E.2d 292, 92 Ohio St. 3d 214
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 2001·No. No. 00-2271·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., Bruce S. Rutsky and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant. Eugene G. Gillis and Daniel D. Domozick, for appellee. Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heilman v. Progressive Insurance, 749 N.E.2d 292, 92 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 2001).

749 N.E.2d 292 (Heilman v. Progressive Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heilman v. Progressive Ins. Co.
2001 Ohio 175 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)