Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Heilman v. Progressive Insurance

Heilman v. Progressive Insurance

749 N.E.2d 292, 92 Ohio St. 3d 214
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 2001
DocketNo. 00-2271
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 749 N.E.2d 292 (Heilman v. Progressive Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heilman v. Progressive Insurance, 749 N.E.2d 292, 92 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 2001).

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., Bruce S. Rutsky and Todd O. Rosenberg, for appellant. Eugene G. Gillis and Daniel D. Domozick, for appellee. Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cordle v. Jackson, Unpublished Decision (1-18-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
Heilman v. Progressive Ins. Co.
2001 Ohio 175 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
749 N.E.2d 292, 92 Ohio St. 3d 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heilman-v-progressive-insurance-ohio-2001.