Heileg v. . Dumas .

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Heileg v. . Dumas .

69 N.C. 206

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 5, 1873

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 N.C. 206 (Heileg v. . Dumas .) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heileg v. . Dumas ., 69 N.C. 206 (N.C. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Reade, J.

This case has been before us heretofore, 65 N. C. Rep. 214. And one of the exceptions in the case then is precisely the sixth exception in the case before us now, to-wit: that in order to show that the defendant, Dumas, signed the bond, the plaintiff was allowed to show that Dumas and Martin, another obligor in the bond, were on friendly terms. This was excepted to by the defendant, and we sustained the exception then, and of course we sustain it now-

There is error.

Pee Cuexam. Venire de novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reade, J.

This case has been before us heretofore, 65 N. C. Rep. 214. And one of the exceptions in the case then is precisely the sixth exception in the case before us now, to-wit: that in order to show that the defendant, Dumas, signed the bond, the plaintiff was allowed to show that Dumas and Martin, another obligor in the bond, were on friendly terms. This was excepted to by the defendant, and we sustained the exception then, and of course we sustain it now-

There is error.

Pee Cuexam. Venire de novo.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 N.C. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heileg-v-dumas-nc-1873.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack