Heileg v. . Dumas .

69 N.C. 206
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Reade, J.

This case has been before us heretofore, 65 N. C. Rep. 214. And one of the exceptions in the case then is precisely the sixth exception in the case before us now, to-wit: that in order to show that the defendant, Dumas, signed the bond, the plaintiff was allowed to show that Dumas and Martin, another obligor in the bond, were on friendly terms. This was excepted to by the defendant, and we sustained the exception then, and of course we sustain it now-

There is error.

Pee Cuexam. Venire de novo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heileg v. . Dumas ., 69 N.C. 206 (N.C. 1873).

69 N.C. 206 (Heileg v. . Dumas .) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. Wooten
76 S.E.2d 326 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Hunt v. Wooten
76 S.E.2d 326 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)