Heilbron v. Superior Court

13 P. 160, 72 Cal. 96, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 468
California Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 1887·No. No. 11995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court.

— Application for writ of mandate- to review order of above-named court dismissing a proceeding or contempt, and to command the court to- punish the party for the alleged contempt.

The court, after hearing the proceeding for contempt, dismissed it, in effect holding that the party proceeded against was not guilty.

It is clear to us that the court acted within its jurisdiction. It construed the judgment out of an alleged disobedience to which the proceeding for contempt had its origin, and must have held that the judgment was not, disobeyed. The court may have erred in its construction of the judgment, but that would he error which this court cannot pass on in this proceeding.

The application for the writ is denied and the proceeding dismissed. So> ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heilbron v. Superior Court, 13 P. 160, 72 Cal. 96, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 468 (Cal. 1887).

13 P. 160 (Heilbron v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woolley v. Wight
238 P. 1114 (Utah Supreme Court, 1925)
State ex rel. Red River Brick Corp. v. District Court
138 N.W. 988 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1912)
Montgomery v. Palmer
59 N.W. 148 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)