Heigel v. Heigel

186 N.E. 99, 125 Ohio St. 638, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 265
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1932
Docket23414
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 186 N.E. 99 (Heigel v. Heigel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heigel v. Heigel, 186 N.E. 99, 125 Ohio St. 638, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 265 (Ohio 1932).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority of Craig v. Welply, 104 Ohio St., 312, and Wells, Jr., v. Wells, 105 Ohio St., 471.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harbaugh v. Utz
160 N.E.2d 358 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)
In Re Guardianship of Gausepohl
200 N.E. 520 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 N.E. 99, 125 Ohio St. 638, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heigel-v-heigel-ohio-1932.