Heigel v. Heigel

186 N.E. 99, 125 Ohio St. 638, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 265
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 1, 1932·No. 23414·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority of Craig v. Welply, 104 Ohio St., 312, and Wells, Jr., v. Wells, 105 Ohio St., 471.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Stephenson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heigel v. Heigel, 186 N.E. 99, 125 Ohio St. 638, 125 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638, 1932 Ohio LEXIS 265 (Ohio 1932).

186 N.E. 99 (Heigel v. Heigel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harbaugh v. Utz
160 N.E.2d 358 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)
In Re Guardianship of Gausepohl
200 N.E. 520 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)