Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.
148 N.Y.S. 1119
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 163 A.D. 939 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 12, 1914·No. No. 5927·Published
Opinion
We think the order of the trial judge setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial was under the circumstances proper, and that such order should not have been reversed. The determination of the Appellate Term and the order of the City Court thereupon entered are therefore reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term, and the original order of the City Court affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co., 148 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
148 N.Y.S. 1119 (Heiferman v. Greenhut Cloak Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.