Heier v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Heier v. State

122 N.E. 578, 188 Ind. 172, 1919 Ind. LEXIS 33

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 25, 1919

DocketNo. 23,438

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 N.E. 578 (Heier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heier v. State, 122 N.E. 578, 188 Ind. 172, 1919 Ind. LEXIS 33 (Ind. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Townsend, J.

— Appellant was convicted of a violation of what is commonly known as the “Blind Tiger” Law and sentenced to pay a fine of $100 and imprisoned in the county jail for thirty days.

It is his contention that he should have been sentenced [173]*173to the penal farm. He attempts to present this question by a motion for a new trial.

An objection to place of imprisonment should have been presented by a motion to modify the judgment. Hunt v. State (1917), 186 Ind. 644, 117 N. E. 856.

Judgment affirmed.

Note. — Reported in 122 N. E. 578. See 97 Am. St. 371, 16 C. J. 1314.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI