Heidtmueller v. Davis

98 So. 791, 210 Ala. 548, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 14
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJanuary 17, 1924
Docket6 Div. 735.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 98 So. 791 (Heidtmueller v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heidtmueller v. Davis, 98 So. 791, 210 Ala. 548, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 14 (Ala. 1924).

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

This is an action of damages for death by wrongful act under Code of 1907, § 2486, known as the “Act to Prevent Homicides.”

The cause of action arose while the railroads were being operated by the federal government, under the act of Congress commonly known as the Federal Control Act (U. S. Comp. St. 1918, U. S. Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 3115%a-3115 %p).

The damages recoverable under our statute being wholly punitive, and the damages allowable in a suit growing out of government control being compensatory only, this action cannot be maintained.

The cause must be affirmed' on the authority of Howard v. Davis, Director General, 209 Ala. 113, 95 South. 354; Payne, Director General, v. Smitherman, 206 Ala. 591, 91 South. 575; Missouri Pacific R. R. Co. v. Ault, 256 U. S. 554, 41 Sup. Ct. 593, 65 L. Ed. 1087.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Littleton v. Vitro Corp. of America
130 F. Supp. 774 (N.D. Alabama, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 791, 210 Ala. 548, 1924 Ala. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heidtmueller-v-davis-ala-1924.