Heiderman v. Erie Railroad

254 A.D. 809, 5 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts and for granting a new trial. (The judgment is for plaintiff in a railroad negligence action. The order denies a new trial on the minutes.) Present —■ Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heiderman v. Erie Railroad, 254 A.D. 809, 5 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 809 (Heiderman v. Erie Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.