Heidenreich v. Sutter

254 A.D. 620, 3 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 23, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 620 (Heidenreich v. Sutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heidenreich v. Sutter, 254 A.D. 620, 3 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Defendant has appealed from a judgment of the Albany County Court in favor of plaintiff [621]*621entered on the verdict of a jury. The action was commenced to recover the sum of $1,000 evidenced by a promissory note. On this appeal defendant concedes that the only question presented relates to the affirmative defense as to whether or not the claim is barred by the Statute of Limitations. A payment of interest amounting to thirty dollars was made on the note on March 18, 1931, by defendant’s daughter and a member of his household. This payment was due on January 1,1931. Defendant contends that the payment by his daughter was made without his knowledge, consent or approval. The jury found upon conflicting evidence that it was made with his authority. The evidence sustains the verdict. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Bock
38 Misc. 2d 195 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1963)
United Trust Corp. v. Burgess
175 Misc. 511 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 620, 3 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heidenreich-v-sutter-nyappdiv-1938.