Heidell v. George A. Murray Co.

255 A.D. 792, 7 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5345
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1938·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Action for damages for personal injuries.- Resettled order denying plaintiff’s motion for the examination of two witnesses before trial reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs; the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Both Clawson and Lent are material witnesses. Then- relationship to the defendant bank and their claimed attitude prior to the bringing on of this motion establish that each of them is a reluctant, unwilling or hostile witness. Special circumstances within the meaning of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act have been made manifest and entitle the plaintiff to take the depositions. (Bartlett v. Sanford, 244 App. Div. 722; La Bonte v. Long Island Railroad Co., 242 id. 844.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heidell v. George A. Murray Co., 255 A.D. 792, 7 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5345 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

255 A.D. 792 (Heidell v. George A. Murray Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ortner v. Bankers Security Life Insurance Society
17 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Donahue v. Donahue
20 Misc. 2d 106 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Lubitz v. Port of New York Authority
8 Misc. 2d 10 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Malagoli v. Bernstein
1 A.D.2d 1042 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Essley Shirt Co. v. Lybrand
3 Misc. 2d 761 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Lyon v. Fieldgren Realty Corp.
190 Misc. 700 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Zirn v. Bradley
257 A.D. 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)