Heidelberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

133 A.3d 737, 635 Pa. 207, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 547, 2016 WL 1223495
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 29, 2016·No. 26 WAP 2015·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, we VACATE the Order of the Commonwealth Court. We REMAND this case to the Commonwealth Court for further consideration in its appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 (providing that an appeal from an order of a Commonwealth agency is directed to the Commonwealth Court’s appellate jurisdiction) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(c) (providing that where a complaint in the nature of mandamus is commenced against a government unit objecting to a governmental determination, where the proper mode of relief is an appeal from that determination, the court shall regard it as an appeal from that determination).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heidelberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, 133 A.3d 737, 635 Pa. 207, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 547, 2016 WL 1223495 (Pa. 2016).

133 A.3d 737 (Heidelberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

B. Torrence v. PBPP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2024