Heidelberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
This text of 133 A.3d 737 (Heidelberg v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, we VACATE the Order of the Commonwealth Court. We REMAND this case to the Commonwealth Court for further consideration in its appellate jurisdiction pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 763 (providing that an appeal from an order of a Commonwealth agency is directed to the Commonwealth Court’s appellate jurisdiction) and 42 Pa.C.S. § 708(c) (providing that where a complaint in the nature of mandamus is commenced against a government unit objecting to a governmental determination, where the proper mode of relief is an appeal from that determination, the court shall regard it as an appeal from that determination).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A.3d 737, 635 Pa. 207, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 547, 2016 WL 1223495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heidelberg-v-pennsylvania-board-of-probation-parole-pa-2016.