Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan
122 A.2d 180, 21 N.J. 335, 1956 N.J. LEXIS 239
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conlon in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heiiee, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan, 122 A.2d 180, 21 N.J. 335, 1956 N.J. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1956).
122 A.2d 180 (Heidel v. Wallace & Tiernan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Viera v. Level Line, Inc.
648 A.2d 748 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.
469 A.2d 22 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Wright v. Purepac Corp.
196 A.2d 695 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1963)
Moore v. Allcast Non-Ferrous Foundry, Inc.
179 A.2d 138 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Silke v. Walter
166 A.2d 837 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Biglioli v. Durotest Corp.
129 A.2d 727 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Clark v. Jelsma
122 A.2d 180 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)