Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.

188 Misc. 198, 67 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2022

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 2, 1947

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 188 Misc. 198 (Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp., 188 Misc. 198, 67 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The demand which is necessary to start the running of the Statute of Limitations must be made within a reasonable time. Here, as matter of law, the action is barred by the statute. •

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and ■votes for affirmance on the ground that under the circumstances present the question of whether demand was made within a reasonable time was one of fact to be determined on trial.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI