Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.

188 Misc. 198, 67 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2022

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 2, 1947·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The demand which is necessary to start the running of the Statute of Limitations must be made within a reasonable time. Here, as matter of law, the action is barred by the statute. •

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and ■votes for affirmance on the ground that under the circumstances present the question of whether demand was made within a reasonable time was one of fact to be determined on trial.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The demand which is necessary to start the running of the Statute of Limitations must be made within a reasonable time. Here, as matter of law, the action is barred by the statute. •

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs and motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted.

Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and ■votes for affirmance on the ground that under the circumstances present the question of whether demand was made within a reasonable time was one of fact to be determined on trial.

Order reversed, etc.

Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp., 188 Misc. 198, 67 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1947 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

188 Misc. 198 (Heide v. Glidden Buick Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related