Heidbrink v. Heidbrink

282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753

This text of 282 A.D.2d 572 (Heidbrink v. Heidbrink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heidbrink v. Heidbrink, 282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated April 22, 1997, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the [573]*573Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered August 3, 2000, which denied, without a hearing, his motion for a downward modification of his obligation to pay maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion was properly denied without a hearing (see, Beck v Beck, 236 AD2d 703, 704; Gerringer v Gerringer, 152 AD2d 652). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gerringer v. Gerringer
152 A.D.2d 652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Beck v. Beck
236 A.D.2d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heidbrink-v-heidbrink-nyappdiv-2001.