Heidbrink v. Heidbrink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heidbrink v. Heidbrink

282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated April 22, 1997, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the [573] Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered August 3, 2000, which denied, without a hearing, his motion for a downward modification of his obligation to pay maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion was properly denied without a hearing (see, Beck v Beck, 236 AD2d 703, 704; Gerringer v Gerringer, 152 AD2d 652). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated April 22, 1997, the defendant former husband appeals from an order of the [573] Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered August 3, 2000, which denied, without a hearing, his motion for a downward modification of his obligation to pay maintenance.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant’s motion was properly denied without a hearing (see, Beck v Beck, 236 AD2d 703, 704; Gerringer v Gerringer, 152 AD2d 652). Ritter, J. P., Krausman, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Heidbrink v. Heidbrink, 282 A.D.2d 572, 723 N.Y.S.2d 374, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

282 A.D.2d 572 (Heidbrink v. Heidbrink) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related