Heidbreder v. State

603 So. 2d 674, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9174, 1992 WL 193006
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 13, 1992·No. No. 91-1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction of attempted first degree murder is affirmed, there being no abuse of discretion by the trial court in excluding the specific testimony identified in Appellant’s brief.

We likewise affirm Appellant’s sentence. The trial court’s decision to use the category 1 scoresheet rather than the category 9 scoresheet when sentencing Appellant is consistent with this court’s decision in Hayles v. State, 596 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). As in Hayles, we certify direct conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heidbreder v. State, 603 So. 2d 674, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9174, 1992 WL 193006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

603 So. 2d 674 (Heidbreder v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heidbreder v. State
613 So. 2d 1322 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)