Heidbreder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Heidbreder v. State

603 So. 2d 674, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9174, 1992 WL 193006

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 13, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1930

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 603 So. 2d 674 (Heidbreder v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heidbreder v. State, 603 So. 2d 674, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9174, 1992 WL 193006 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction of attempted first degree murder is affirmed, there being no abuse of discretion by the trial court in excluding the specific testimony identified in Appellant’s brief.

We likewise affirm Appellant’s sentence. The trial court’s decision to use the category 1 scoresheet rather than the category 9 scoresheet when sentencing Appellant is consistent with this court’s decision in Hayles v. State, 596 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). As in Hayles, we certify direct conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI