Hefner v. Yount

8 Blackf. 455, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 73
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided July 19, 1847·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

A. AND B. his wife conveyed certain real estate to C. and' ' D. on condition that the grantors should be permitted to continue to occupy the house on the premises, and that the grantees, their heirs, executors, and administrators, should furnish the grantors a decent and comfortable support during their (the grantors’) lives. Held, that said condition was a condition subsequent; and that if the possession of said house and a suitable support were not furnished to B. after the death of her husband, she might claim her dower in the premises.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hefner v. Yount, 8 Blackf. 455, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 73 (Ind. 1847).

8 Blackf. 455 (Hefner v. Yount) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.
127 N.E. 609 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1920)
Glocke v. Glocke
57 L.R.A. 458 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
Hershman v. Hershman
63 Ind. 451 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Scott v. Stipe
12 Ind. 74 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1859)
Leach v. Leach
4 Ind. 628 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)