Hefner v. Hesse
This text of 26 La. Ann. 148 (Hefner v. Hesse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is well settled that want of citation of appeal will be cured where the appellee appears and contests the case on any other ground. Therefore when the plaintiff, appellee herein, moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record does not contain all the evidence adduced on this trial, he set up a defense which amounts to a voluntary appearance in^the case, and it cured his objection that he was not cited as appellee.
The motion to dismiss the appeal for want of proper citation is therefore denied.
On the merits, the appellants contend that there is no proof that they are liable as solidary obligors on the note which is the basis of plaintiff’s action against them.
There is no note of evidence; and the rule is that the judge who condemned the defendants as commercial partners solidarily on their note, did so upon proper evidence. 22 An. 73; 23 An. 39-3, 504; 24 An. 20.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 La. Ann. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hefner-v-hesse-la-1874.