Hefner v. Hesse

26 La. Ann. 148
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 15, 1874·No. No. 4971·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Wily, J.

It is well settled that want of citation of appeal will be cured where the appellee appears and contests the case on any other ground. Therefore when the plaintiff, appellee herein, moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the record does not contain all the evidence adduced on this trial, he set up a defense which amounts to a voluntary appearance in^the case, and it cured his objection that he was not cited as appellee.

The motion to dismiss the appeal for want of proper citation is therefore denied.

On the merits, the appellants contend that there is no proof that they are liable as solidary obligors on the note which is the basis of plaintiff’s action against them.

There is no note of evidence; and the rule is that the judge who condemned the defendants as commercial partners solidarily on their note, did so upon proper evidence. 22 An. 73; 23 An. 39-3, 504; 24 An. 20.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hefner v. Hesse, 26 La. Ann. 148 (La. 1874).

26 La. Ann. 148 (Hefner v. Hesse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Staggs
95 So. 2d 376 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1957)
Bascle v. Perez
71 So. 2d 551 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1954)
Streat v. Unity Industrial Life Ins. Co.
140 So. 709 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Chestine Land Corp. v. Schuler
140 So. 112 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Lafayette v. Farr
110 So. 624 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)
Lemoine v. Dupuis
2 La. App. 726 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Richardson v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.
96 So. 662 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)
Lane v. Ferre
86 So. 186 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1918)
Boyd v. Bradley
63 So. 883 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1913)
Ansley v. Stuart
48 So. 953 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)