Heffron v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

175 A.D. 962

This text of 175 A.D. 962 (Heffron v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heffron v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 175 A.D. 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Woodward and Cochrane, JJ., who voted for reversal on the ground that the case presented an issue of fact which should have been submitted to the jury. This court reversed a judgment for the plaintiff on a former appeal on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence, and ordered a new trial (140 App. Div. 943), at which new trial the evidence should again have been submitted to the j ury; the record in the second trial being precisely the same as that in the first.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heffron-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1916.