Heffner v. Reed
This text of 3 Grant 245 (Heffner v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion was delivered
Though there are a good many assignments of error here, yet only two of them, the second and the last, are relied on, and even these we cannot sustain. Our short judgment in replevin, when in favor of the defendant, is a judgment for the return of the goods replevied, and it would be so in terms were it written out in full. In a suit on the replevin bond it may be declared upon as if it were so written, for such is the legal effect.
It seems to us that it was right to not allow the sheriff to contradict his return to the replevin. If it is false, the party injured by it has his remedy.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Grant 245, 1858 Pa. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heffner-v-reed-pa-1858.