Heffner v. Day

14 S.W. 1090, 54 Ark. 79, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 2
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 3, 1891·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

What is a final The decree is not a final disposition of the whole controversy as to the appellant. There is no ascertainment of the amount of the debts due the attaching creditors, who the court has indicated shall be preferred to the appellant in the distribution of the assets, and there is no direction to pay out any sum. For aught that appears, the appellant’s debt may be paid out of the property covered by the assignment; and if so, no injury has been done. The appeal is premature. Myers v. Becker, 95 N. Y., 486; Davie v. Davie, 52 Ark., 224. The motion to dismiss the appeal will be granted.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heffner v. Day, 14 S.W. 1090, 54 Ark. 79, 1891 Ark. LEXIS 2 (Ark. 1891).

14 S.W. 1090 (Heffner v. Day) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGraw v. Berry
280 S.W. 383 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1926)
Seitz v. Meriwether
169 S.W. 1175 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)
Hamner v. Scott
60 F. 343 (Eighth Circuit, 1894)