Heffner v. Albright

80 A. 887, 231 Pa. 396, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 855
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 10, 1911
DocketAppeal, No. 106
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 A. 887 (Heffner v. Albright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heffner v. Albright, 80 A. 887, 231 Pa. 396, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 855 (Pa. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was a scire facias to revive and continue the lien of a judgment entered in the common pleas, upon the filing of a certified transcript from the orphans’ court, showing a balance due by executors to the widow of the decedent. At the trial, offers of testimony were made, to show that before the adjudication by the orphans’ court one of the executors had sold the widow six houses under a verbal agreement with her that he, and his coexecutor “were to take of such moneys as might come into their hands” as executors, the amount of the purchase price of the houses that was unpaid. The purpose of the offer, as stated by counsel, was to prove that long prior to the adjudication, the amount the widow was found to be entitled to, had by the agreement mentioned, been paid her, and that nothing was then due her by the executors. The assignments of error relate to the overruling of these offers and the direction of a verdict for the plaintiff.

In settling the accounts of executors, administrators and guardians the jurisdiction of the orphans’ court is exclusive, and in a proceeding on its transcript in the common pleas, no defenses but payment after the adjudication and nul tiel record are available: Bernhardt v. Taylor, 223 Pa. 307.

If the agreement attempted to be set up could, as argued, be considered an equitable assignment of an amount sufficient to pay the balance of the purchase money of the houses, it was, in effect, a payment pro tanto by the executor to the widow. The adjudication was conclusive of the amount due by the former to the latter, and that matter could not be inquired into by the common pleas.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catanzaritti v. Bianco
198 A. 806 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A. 887, 231 Pa. 396, 1911 Pa. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heffner-v-albright-pa-1911.