Heffington v. FCA US LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 14, 2020·No. 2:17-cv-00317·Unknown

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ROBERT HEFFINGTON CASE NO : 2:17-cv-00317-DAD-JLT

11 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING v. JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 12 DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Doc. 112) 13 FCA US LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 14

Defendants. 15

16 The parties have settled their case and have stipulated to the action being dismissed with 17 prejudice. (Doc. 112) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations 18 effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 19 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action, but, at the request of the parties, the Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. 20

21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: September 14, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 23 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heffington v. FCA US LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Heffington v. FCA US LLC (Heffington v. FCA US LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)