Heesemann v. Heesemann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heesemann v. Heesemann

52 A.D.2d 579, 382 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12153

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 5, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 579 (Heesemann v. Heesemann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heesemann v. Heesemann, 52 A.D.2d 579, 382 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 30, 1975, which, inter alia, (1) granted plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment and (2) awarded her $50 a week as alimony, $30 a week as support for each of the children and a $1,000 counsel fee. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the record amply supports Special Term’s grant of the divorce and its disposition of the financial aspects of the case, including the alimony and support provisions of the judgment (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Hargett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 30, 1975, which, inter alia, (1) granted plaintiff a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment and (2) awarded her $50 a week as alimony, $30 a week as support for each of the children and a $1,000 counsel fee. Judgment affirmed, with costs. In our opinion, the record amply supports Special Term’s grant of the divorce and its disposition of the financial aspects of the case, including the alimony and support provisions of the judgment (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Hargett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 579, 382 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heesemann-v-heesemann-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack