Heerwagen v. Ritzman

New York Supreme Court

Heerwagen v. Ritzman

32 N.Y.S. 1144

DecidedMarch 19, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 1144 (Heerwagen v. Ritzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heerwagen v. Ritzman, 32 N.Y.S. 1144 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

EHRLICH, 0. J.

The action is for brokerage in procuring a customer for certain premises known as “No. 532 Ninth Avenue,” this city. The case involved the questions whether the plaintiffs had been employed to make the sale, and whether they were the procuring cause thereof. The court left these questions to the jury, under a clear charge, and they found that the plaintiffs had been employed by the defendant, and that the purchaser had been procured through . their instrumentality. The evidence sufficiently sustains the jury’s finding, and the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EHRLICH, 0. J.

The action is for brokerage in procuring a customer for certain premises known as “No. 532 Ninth Avenue,” this city. The case involved the questions whether the plaintiffs had been employed to make the sale, and whether they were the procuring cause thereof. The court left these questions to the jury, under a clear charge, and they found that the plaintiffs had been employed by the defendant, and that the purchaser had been procured through . their instrumentality. The evidence sufficiently sustains the jury’s finding, and the judgment and order appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y.S. 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heerwagen-v-ritzman-nysupct-1895.