Heermance v. Scocozza

248 A.D. 572

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heermance v. Scocozza, 248 A.D. 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 572 (Heermance v. Scocozza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.