Heermance v. Scocozza
248 A.D. 572
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heermance v. Scocozza, 248 A.D. 572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
248 A.D. 572 (Heermance v. Scocozza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.