Heer v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Heer v. Hines

105 S.E. 850, 26 Ga. App. 154, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 37

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 25, 1921

Docket11236

StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 850 (Heer v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heer v. Hines, 105 S.E. 850, 26 Ga. App. 154, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 37 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The action was for commissions on certain work alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff under a contract with the defendant. After hearing the evidence and upon a construction of the contract, the court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for a part of his claim, and a verdict in favor of the defendant for the remainder of the claim. Under the terms of the contract and the evidence of the plaintiff, there was but one verdict that could have been rendered. It was not error for the court to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $244.29, and to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant for the remainder of the sum claimed to be due by the plaintiff. There was no reversible error upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles G. J., and Bloodworth, J. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The action was for commissions on certain work alleged to have been performed by the plaintiff under a contract with the defendant. After hearing the evidence and upon a construction of the contract, the court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for a part of his claim, and a verdict in favor of the defendant for the remainder of the claim. Under the terms of the contract and the evidence of the plaintiff, there was but one verdict that could have been rendered. It was not error for the court to direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $244.29, and to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant for the remainder of the sum claimed to be due by the plaintiff. There was no reversible error upon the trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles G. J., and Bloodworth, J. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 S.E. 850, 26 Ga. App. 154, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heer-v-hines-gactapp-1921.