Heep v. Cabel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Heep v. Cabel

240 A.D. 859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 859 (Heep v. Cabel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Heep v. Cabel, 240 A.D. 859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. The court was without power to grant a special preference to the plaintiff under subdivision 21 of section 138 of the Civil Practice Act. Preferences provided for by that section are granted only over the issues noticed for the same term. (Yorkshire Ins. Co., Ltd., v. Raw Fur & Skin Trading Co., 233 App. Div. 486; Weinberg v. National Transportation Co., Inc., 239 id. 905.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. The court was without power to grant a special preference to the plaintiff under subdivision 21 of section 138 of the Civil Practice Act. Preferences provided for by that section are granted only over the issues noticed for the same term. (Yorkshire Ins. Co., Ltd., v. Raw Fur & Skin Trading Co., 233 App. Div. 486; Weinberg v. National Transportation Co., Inc., 239 id. 905.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heep-v-cabel-nyappdiv-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack