Heeger v. Lamke

770 S.W.2d 747, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 720, 1989 WL 53948
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 23, 1989·No. No. 55196·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a quiet title action. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heeger v. Lamke, 770 S.W.2d 747, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 720, 1989 WL 53948 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

770 S.W.2d 747 (Heeger v. Lamke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. Carron
536 S.W.2d 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1976)