Heefner v. Citizens Trust Savings Bank

278 P. 872, 99 Cal. App. 794, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 618
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 6, 1929
DocketDocket No. 5229.
StatusPublished

This text of 278 P. 872 (Heefner v. Citizens Trust Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heefner v. Citizens Trust Savings Bank, 278 P. 872, 99 Cal. App. 794, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

The facts are similar in this case to those stated in Wiberg v. Barnum, ante, p. 323 [278 P. 871], except that on the back of one of the contracts here involved the following appears:

"We agree to resell lots 14 in Block 48, lots 2/42, for Mrs. Heefner, and that she will not have to make 2nd payments (6 mos. from now) on same. Resales to be as early as possible."

[1] For the reasons stated in the decision of that case, this day filed, the judgment herein is reversed.

Works, P.J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on July 5, 1929, and a petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 5, 1929.

All the Justices present concurred. *Page 795

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wiberg v. Barnum
278 P. 871 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 P. 872, 99 Cal. App. 794, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heefner-v-citizens-trust-savings-bank-calctapp-1929.