Heefner v. Citizens Trust Savings Bank
This text of 278 P. 872 (Heefner v. Citizens Trust Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The facts are similar in this case to those stated in Wiberg
v. Barnum, ante, p. 323 [
"We agree to resell lots 14 in Block 48, lots 2/42, for Mrs. Heefner, and that she will not have to make 2nd payments (6 mos. from now) on same. Resales to be as early as possible."
[1] For the reasons stated in the decision of that case, this day filed, the judgment herein is reversed.
Works, P.J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on July 5, 1929, and a petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 5, 1929.
All the Justices present concurred. *Page 795
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 P. 872, 99 Cal. App. 794, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heefner-v-citizens-trust-savings-bank-calctapp-1929.