Heebner v. Town of Orange City

44 Fla. 159
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause being reached in its regulab order on the docket for final adjudication wa® referred by the court to its commissioners for investigation, who report the same reoc'inmending dismissal of the appeal. Upon considera tion of the cause upon the abstracts of the record the court finds that the proceeding wa® a statutory petition under Chapter 4601 laws of 1897, and from the judgment in which an appeal has been taken to this court instead of a writ of error. Such a proceeding is one at law and not in equity. City of Tampa v. Mugge, 40 Fla. 326, 24 South. Rep. 489; City of Tampa v. Kaunitz, 39 Fla. 683, 23 South. Rep. 416. Since the adoption of the Revised Statute® there is no such thing as an appeal from a judgment at iaw, but such judgments can be reviewed only by writ of error unless especially otherwise provided. The said appeal taken in said cause is, therefore, hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heebner v. Town of Orange City, 44 Fla. 159 (Fla. 1902).

44 Fla. 159 (Heebner v. Town of Orange City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whidden v. Abbott
160 So. 475 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon Park
149 So. 409 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Wrens Inv. Corp. v. Amos, as Comptroller
144 So. 680 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
First Nat'l Bank of Miami v. Bebinger
128 So. 862 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.
289 P. 132 (Utah Supreme Court, 1930)
Jones v. Escambia Land & Manufacturing Co.
55 Fla. 783 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
Clinton v. Colclough
54 Fla. 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1907)
Trabue v. Williams
46 Fla. 228 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)
Finch v. Bonar
46 Fla. 246 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1903)