Hee Sook Lee v. Regan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hee Sook Lee v. Regan

200 A.D.2d 849, 608 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 229

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 200 A.D.2d 849 (Hee Sook Lee v. Regan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hee Sook Lee v. Regan, 200 A.D.2d 849, 608 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, substantial evidence exists to support respondent’s determination that she is not permanently disabled from performing her duties as a nurse. The medical evidence showed conflicting diagnoses as to the extent of petitioner’s disability. It is well settled, however, that the evaluation of conflicting medical evidence by respondent must be accepted and he may accord more weight to the [850]*850opinion of one physician over another. Finally, decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board are not binding on respondent.

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, substantial evidence exists to support respondent’s determination that she is not permanently disabled from performing her duties as a nurse. The medical evidence showed conflicting diagnoses as to the extent of petitioner’s disability. It is well settled, however, that the evaluation of conflicting medical evidence by respondent must be accepted and he may accord more weight to the [850]*850opinion of one physician over another. Finally, decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board are not binding on respondent.

Weiss, P. J., Mercure, Cardona, White and Casey, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 A.D.2d 849, 608 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hee-sook-lee-v-regan-nyappdiv-1994.