Hedrick v. Zoning Hearing Board
This text of 453 A.2d 387 (Hedrick v. Zoning Hearing Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The Northampton County Common Pleas Court affirmed the Lower Saucon Township Zoning Hearing Board’s denial of Edwin and Gertrude Hedrick’s variance request. We affirm.
The Hedricks were cited for operating a business on a parcel of residentially-zoned property. They appealed to the board and sought a variance, alleging that the business was a valid prior nonconforming use,1 which was denied. On appeal to the common pleas court, the Hedricks argued that the board abused its discretion in assessing the weight of the evidence and that the trial court should present them with the opportunity to introduce additional evidence. The court rejected these arguments and denied the appeal.
The Hedricks raise the same contentions before this Court. After a careful review of the record and [628]*628law, we find these contentions to be without merit, and affirm on the able opinion of Freedberg, J., below, Pa. D. & C.3rd (1981).
Order
The Northampton County Common Pleas Court order, No. 1981-0-1300, dated July 16, 1981, is hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 A.2d 387, 70 Pa. Commw. 626, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedrick-v-zoning-hearing-board-pacommwct-1982.