Hedrick v. State
This text of 555 So. 2d 1329 (Hedrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Hedrick’s convictions and sentences without prejudice to his filing a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Hedrick’s arguments with respect to the special conditions of probation have been waived by failure to object in the trial court. McPike v. State, 473 So.2d 291 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We strike the imposition of costs and attorney’s fees without prejudice to the state’s seeking reassessment after proper notice and hearing. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla.1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 So. 2d 1329, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 587, 1990 WL 7524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hedrick-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.