Hedrick v. Newtron, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Hedrick v. Newtron, Inc.

477 So. 2d 729, 1985 La. App. LEXIS 8101

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 30, 1985

DocketNo. 84-74

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 477 So. 2d 729 (Hedrick v. Newtron, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hedrick v. Newtron, Inc., 477 So. 2d 729, 1985 La. App. LEXIS 8101 (La. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

FORET, Judge.

For the reasons assigned this date in Carroll v. Newtron, Inc., 477 So.2d 719 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), (our docket number 84-73, with which this case is consolidated on appeal), the decision of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part as follows:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Fisher Controls, Inc.; and E.B. Badger & Sons Co., and its successor corporation, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation, against plaintiffs, James Kenneth Hedrick, Jr. and all third party plaintiffs, are hereby granted, and these defendants are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the motions for summary judgment filed on behalf of Rosemount, Inc.; Magnetrol International, Inc.; Ronan, Inc.; Moore Products Company; Newtron, Inc.; S.I.P. Engineering, Inc.; and Johnson Controls, Inc. against plaintiffs, James Kenneth Hedrick, Jr. and all third party plaintiffs, are hereby denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the action of Lena Diane Bruette Hedrick, as to all defendants, is dismissed with prejudice.

Costs of the trial court and of this appeal shall await final disposition of this matter.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI